Concerning Tolle, TAG, and true transformation

“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written:

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.”

Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?” (1 Corinthians 1:18-20)

“However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory, which none of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory” (1 Corinthians 2:6-8)

In contrast to “The Secret” school of Christian, Hermetic money-making, there are many figures within the New Age movement who have gained prominence by combing disparate spiritual traditions in the vein of Theosophy.

Eckhart Tolle (Oprah’s Richard Rohr) stands out as a particularly influential example.

He is by no means the only writer to synthesize Vedic philosophy with a reinterpreted Christianity, Tolle’s success exemplifies how this formula has widespread appeal in the West. Through his works like The Power of Now and A New Earth, he builds on the pantheistic worldview shared by many New Age thinkers, emphasizing the dissolution of the ego and alignment with an impersonal universal consciousness.

While Tolle departs from Byrne’s consumptive spirituality, his ability to market this spiritual framework is, in many ways, reflective of the broader movement’s tendency to appropriate Eastern philosophy while simultaneously co-opting Christian Scripture to validate its teachings. This is not unlike earlier New Thought writers, who similarly claimed to unveil the “true” interpretation of biblical texts, often in service of their own ideological systems. Tolle’s shift from material manifestation to spiritual awakening positions himself as a modern spiritual teacher of ancient wisdom while perpetuating the theological errors that characterize much of New Age thought.

Eckhart Tolle’s own worldview is akin to the Advaita Vedanta tradition as espoused by the Theosophical Society’s monistic philosophy. This is a significant issue with many modern spiritual teachers and self-help authors, who trace their roots back to the New Age movement of the 20th century. In this regard, these thinkers perpetuate the same individualistic spirituality found in Schleiermacher’s emphasis on personal feeling and direct experience with God, as well as the New Thought movement’s claim of possessing the “true” interpretation of Scripture—one that conveniently promotes their own system.

Over time, this system evolved into a focus on manifesting wealth and happiness, often driven by consumerism. While the consumeristic nature of such spirituality is problematic, a more pressing concern is the ongoing fallacious eisegesis—where contemporary thinkers like Tolle impose their own spiritual wisdom onto Scripture, ignoring the historical and theological context in which these texts were written and recorded.

An example of Tolle’s theological presentism in relation to Jesus’ teachings are as follows,

“‘Take no thought for the morrow; for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself,’ or ‘Nobody who puts his hands to the plow and looks back is fit for the Kingdom of God.’ […] The depth and radical nature of these teachings are not recognized. No one seems to realize that they are meant to be lived and so bring about a profound inner transformation.”[1] 

Tolle’s interpretation of Jesus’ words about taking ‘no thought for the morrow’ reflects a broader tendency within New Age spirituality to universalize teachings while neglecting their original eschatological context. His use of this verse downplays the eschatological urgency of Christ’s words while emphasizing Tolle’s teaching about the eternal present moment, however if we refer to Patristic commentary then we will see that the verse must be put into its context, with Jesus talking to His would-be followers who found different excuses to not follow.

The eleventh century monk, Theophylact, who is mostly condensing the work done by fourth century Church Father, John Chrysostom, writes that in the passage and chapter of Luke, Christ is saying that He is above all, and that “we must not allow any obstacle to our doing of good, and we must scorn nature itself when it stands in the way,”[2] this passage is about leaving the world and practicing godliness, treading the commandments and following after Jesus Christ, it is essentially the cost of discipleship.

The cost of discipleship—forsaking all for the sake of Christ—is entirely absent from the framework of New Age spirituality. Instead, these teachings are reinterpreted to promote a pantheistic, non-dual worldview and ironically materialistic that emphasizes personal revelation and privatized enlightenment over communal faith and selfless service. This distortion reduces Jesus to a spiritual healer or an enlightened being, stripping his words of their eschatological and salvific significance.

In this monistic worldview, the call to actionable service is lost. The loving dimension of loving and serving others becomes irrelevant when all distinctions between self and other dissolves into a single consciousness. This is in stark contrast to the Christian understanding of unity and diversity within communal solidarity, rooted in the Trinitarian nature of God. It is precisely because we are distinct yet made in the image of Triune God that we are called to love and care for others. This is what is being put forth by the Apostle Paul when he writes, “For as we have many members in one body, but all the members do not have the same function, so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another” (Rom. 12:4-5). 

The historical context of Jesus being the Messiah, appearing in a specific moment in sequential history, is also missing in this interpretation. The Incarnation, the Word of God made flesh, is God’s definitive entry into history. This act sanctifies time itself, affirming its ultimate purpose, or telos. This eschatological framework points to the fulfillment of God’s redemptive plan. In contrast, the non-dual worldview, dismissing time as an illusion, undermines the reality of the Incarnation and the hope of the resurrection.

By misusing Scripture to promote a worldview detached from its historical and theological roots, New Age spirituality negates the presuppositions of early Christian faith. These presuppositions—that God reveals Himself through history and that humanity is called into a covenantal, communal relationship with Him—are essential to understanding the Gospel. Without them, the transformative power of Christ’s teachings is reduced to mere platitudes, devoid of their true salvific purpose.

Salvation is integral to the Orthodox Christian paradigm, and at the heart of it is the Incarnation. It is the definitive act of God entering into time, affirming its reality, as well as personhood and creation. Without the reality of the Incarnation, the Resurrection loses its meaning, and the hope embedded in it, and so, too, the promise of eternal life and communion with God. 

In contrast, the non-dualist worldview—along with the other spiritual teachings that extract Scripture to suit their own agendas—negates the very essence of Christianity. Christianity cannot exist without time, without personhood, without a Savior. It does not become a Western Buddhism by reducing Jesus Christ to simply an enlightened being, it becomes arbitrary and meaningless.

The Orthodox doctrine of the Trinity uniquely accounts for both the seen and unseen worlds, providing the metaphysical grounding for understanding love, relationality, and purpose. Unlike the monistic view offered by thinkers such as Eckhart Tolle or the New Age movement, the Trinity reveals a perfect communion of three distinct Persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—undivided in essence, yet distinct in personhood. This unity-in-diversity is reflected in the Body of Christ, what the Apostle Paul is talking about in his epistle to the Romans, we are all united in purpose which is to worship God and serve one another, yet we remain distinct in our personhood.

Personhood’s eternal significance rests on the Trinitarian doctrine, because man is made in the image of God: Who is eternal, not only are we meant for relationships reflective of the inner life of the Trinity, but we also bear within us eternal significance. We become persons in communion with others; community is essential, not optional. Without the Trinity, relational love collapses into fragmented into fragmented individualism or monistic self-absorption. If ultimate reality is impersonal consciousness, then personhood, love, and relationships are illusory, devoid of eternal meaning.

Pantheism, by collapsing distinction into one universal consciousness, cannot account for the diversity we see. How does distinction—between truth and falsehood, subject and object—arise from an undifferentiated oneness? The Christian understanding of the Trinity, by contrast, provides the necessary grounding for knowledge, logic, and moral agency. Logic depends on distinction: true/false, good/evil. A worldview that dienes real distinctions undermines its own claims of coherence.

 Sequential time, far from being illusory, is a created reality in which God acts and reveals Himself. The Incarnation sanctifies time, pointing toward its ultimate fulfillment in the eschaton. To dismiss time as illusory renders the Incarnation, Crucifixion, and Resurrection meaningless. This theological distortion strips away the hope and cooperative purpose embedded in God’s divine telos. Without the reality of time, our choices, relationships, and struggles lose their salvific significance.

As St. John of Kronstadt writes:

“The Lord, as an artful physician, subjects us to various trials, sorrows, illnesses, and misfortunes, in order to purify us like gold in the furnace. A soul that is hardened in various sins does not easily undergo cleansing and healing, but has to be forced to a great extent, and only through lengthy experience in patience and suffering does it become accustomed to virtue and begins to love God, from Whom it was alienated after becoming attached to all kinds of mortal sins. Such is the purpose of the trials and tribulations sent to us by God in this life.”

Trials are not meaningless, they lead us towards salvation, as the Apostle Paul affirms:

“If you endure chastening, God deals with you as with sons; for what son is there whom a father does not chasten? But if you are without chastening, of which all have become partakers, then you are illegitimate and not sons” (Heb. 12:7-8).

Christianity calls us to communal solidarity, bearing one another’s burdens in humility before God (Gal. 6:2-3). This contrasts sharply with the non-dualist worldview, which lacks the imperative to follow the two greatest commandments:

“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ This is the first commandment. And the second, like it, is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these” (Mark 12:30-31).

Sacrificial love, grounded in the unity-in-diversity of the Trinity, is central to the Christian life. As the Blessed Theophylact reminds us:

“He who loves God, also loves God’s creation; and that part of His creation which is the most akin to God is man. Therefore he who loves God will also love all mankind.”[3]

In the non-dualist worldview, there is no true neighbor, Creator, or creation—undermining the very foundation of love, forgiveness, and repentance. If time and relationships are illusory, why forgive or seek forgiveness? Without these, there is no coherence to existence.

Forgiveness manifests God’s presence in a profound and powerful way. It frees others and humbles us, aligning us with God’s reality. This is not New Thought’s pantheistic alignment of mind with Divine Mind, but a complete surrender to God the Creator and His divine will. True humility recognizes our dependance on Christ, the God-man who saves us. By contrast, New Age pantheism denies the need for a Savior, placing the realization of ultimate reality in the hands of the individual.

This distortion of Scripture encourages a self-referential spirituality, rooted in subjective experience rather than communal faith.  Spirituality has become a commodified product that negates the difficult work of religious renunciants, ascetics, and theologians who have struggled to preserve their faith. This commodified adulteration presents a feel-good opiate which seeks to use Scripture for manifesting material wealth or to support a spiritual worldview which is incoherent and serves only to inflate the ego of practitioners.

The New Age spiritualities, particularly those that adopt an Eastern view, “reflect a very Western cultural obsession with the individual self and a distinct lack of interest in compassion, the discipling of desire, selfless service to others and questions of social justice.”[4]  

The Gospel calls us to sacrificial love, humility, and service to God and others—qualities incompatible with a worldview that reduces existence to impersonal oneness and denies the need from communion with Christ.

The theological presentism exhibited by contemporary thinkers like Rhonda Bryne and Eckhart Tolle underscore a current trend of divorcing Christian Scripture from its broader theological and historical context. The communal and covenantal relationship between God, man, and neighbor is distorted by the misinterpretation through the contemporary lenses of self-help, materialism, and pantheism.   

This distortion is not simply a theological error, it actively works against call of the Trinitarian God to humility, to acts of loving service, to forsaking all for the sake of Christ in discipleship. It reduces the universal message of community, sacrificial love, and surrender to a system of private spirituality and self-realization.

This New Age spiritual framework is grounded in experiences of feel-good enterprises and exercises that strips the Incarnate Word of His historical significance and the nature of the Trinity that obfuscates the transformative power of the redemptive work of the second Person of the Trinity. The work of the Word, despite the claims of New Age eisegesis, transcends time and culture by its grounding in its specific time and culture.

Christ is a reality, even if we simply go off scholarly standards, He lived and was crucified, that much is generally agreed upon by current scholarship. When we project onto Him and the record of His life we are engaging with this text fallaciously, reducing this historical figure to simply a mouthpiece for self-improvement, prosperity, and pantheistic paradigms. Therefore, the stakes of this reductionism and erroneous presentism are high. If we turn to an Orthodox Christian framework, specifically, salvation is integral to corporate worship.

The Divine Liturgy is the way in which an individual becomes a person within the unified whole, which is understood as the very Body of Christ, that is—in a mystical fashion—actually becoming both the sum of the host of individuals and the representative figure embodies the group, truly, Who is the Anointed One, or Messiah.

The Incarnation explains Christianity, the Incarnation explains the Mysteries of the Church, and the Incarnation explains the salvific work of Christ, both in time and in the present.

When contemporary spiritual thinkers misinterpret Jesus’ words for their own agendas, they not only misrepresent Christianity but also offend epistemic humility—the acknowledgment of bias and the respect for a text’s theological and historical integrity. To ground ourselves in the contextual complexities of Scripture is to unlock its universal truths.

Sacred texts like the Bible are meant to change the reader, to render the world around them and provide a narrative structure for them to fit into and from there be transformed—not for material gain or fleeting enlightenment—but for a deeper conversion that radiates outward, renewing the individual and the world around them in Christ.

This mystical union preserves the integrity of individual personhood while simultaneously transcending individualism through communal worship and shared participation in the sacramental life. The Divine Liturgy becomes not just a ritual, but the lived expression of the Trinitarian unity that grounds that Christian faith.

By contrast, the New Age emphasis on self-realization and individual enlightenment often reduces community to an optional concern. This focus undermines the Christian understanding of salvation as a communal process. On that requires us to participate in the life of the Church. The self-referential system of New Age spirituality echoes the pietistic tendencies of modernity, where personal intuition take precedence over communal and doctrinal integrity. As a result, Scripture is misused as a tool for personal affirmation rather than a guide for communal worship, repentance, and transformation.

The privatization of spirituality is not only theologically problematic but also socially isolated. It detaches individuals from communal bonds that foster accountability, humility, and genuine love. Where New Age spirituality fosters isolation and self-focus, the Orthodox faith calls individuals into a shared life of repentance, worship, and service. This communal framework transforms not only the person but also the world around them through sacrificial love rooted in divine purpose.

The misinterpretation of Scripture within New Age spirituality reduces Christianity to a system of self-help, esoteric individuation, or metaphysical speculation. This reductionism not only distorts the Gospel but also deprives individuals of the profound truths and practices that have sustained the Church for millennia. The communal and sacramental life of the Church offers a framework for growth that is deeply relational, grounded in the reality of Christ’s Incarnation and Resurrection.

In conclusion, the eisegetical misinterpretation and misappropriation of New Age and esoteric modalities of Scripture, as popularized by figures like Eckhart Tolle, represents a departure from the Christian understanding of time, personhood, and community. By dismissing the historical and theological context of Scripture, this worldview undermines the Gospel’s transformative power.

The Orthodox Christian framework, rooted in the Trinitarian doctrine, offers a coherent and holistic vision of reality—one that affirms the significance of history, the necessity of community, and the eternal value of personhood. It is within this framework that the call to love, serve, and worship God finds its fullest expression, preserving the integrity of faith against the distortions of theological presentism and New Age individualism.

Ο ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ ΕΝ ΤΩ ΜΕΣΩ ΗΜΩΝ! ΚΑΙ ΗΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΣΤΙ ΚΑΙ ΕΣΤΑΙ

---

[1] Eckhart Tolle, The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment (Vancouver, Canada: Namaste Publishing, 1999), 43.

[2] Theophylact, The Explanation of the Holy Gospel According to St. Luke, trans. Fr. Christopher Stade (Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2020), 106.

[3] Theophylact, The Explanation of the Holy Gospel According to St. Mark, trans. Fr. Christopher Stade (Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2020), 106.

[4] Carrette and King, Selling Spirituality, 114.