No One is Good Part I


An Unenlightened Digression from a Delayed Denver Layover

Christ is in our midst! He is and ever shall be!

Being sober in Reno is like being underage in New Orleans, there’s fun stuff to do, but you don’t really get the full experience. When I was younger, I thought it’d be funny to move to Reno to pursue stand-up; I never went because the art scene in the city leaves a lot to be desired. 

Reno is like the cool uncle who, despite being able to snowboard or build an engine, is a functioning alcoholic who is one beer run away from a third strike DUI. When I was younger it was where I wanted to be, because a functioning alcoholic tertiary character was always what I aspired to become.

Someone barely holding on in a brilliant, chaotic whirlwind that is more impressive than it is objectively terrifying, like waking up in your bed after a four-hour drive through the Alabama mountains—blitzkrieged on Jager bombs and vodka tonics—to find your car waiting in the driveway, pristine and untouched. Living a life moving from close call to close call, more and more emboldened to keep rolling the dice, night after night, week after week, year after year. 

Reno is the kind of town that just feels like a hot streak about to freeze over, with all sorts of bells and whistles to keep you distracted enough to keep upping the ante. Reno would have done me in had I moved out here when I wanted to, but it’s nice to visit as a slightly wiser person, emotionally distanced enough from my cool brother to enjoy their antics yet not be pulled into them. 

I love it out here, but it’s not where I belong, like staying too late at an office party of a business that never hired you. I can take a deep breath of the high desert cold, feel it shake my lungs and chap my face, but this is home to others. I’m just visiting. I’ll tell you, though, the best part of being away from home is drinking another fella’s coffee. 

I’m up a little after dawn, packing for my flight home; the coffee starts getting cold as soon as it’s in the cup and the nonalcoholic beer I put in snow on the porch exploded overnight. I sit down at the table, built to be danced on, with my friend busy looking for houses in Colorado on Craigslist, asks me how liturgy was the day before and I tell him it was nice (Liturgy feeds my soul but why ruin a perfectly cold, quiet morning by going into all that?).

My friend told me had visited a Tibetan Buddhist center with about four people including himself and decided against it. I can’t say I blame him. That sort of spiritual practice is difficult to get your luggage into when it’s such an intimate setting, like you’re both trying each other on to see the fit without the mercy of informality or the buffer of a mutual friend.

Trying each other out, raw.  

I don’t care much about Buddhism myself, but in terms of my own spiritual journey I’ve always felt more akin to Charles Allan Bennett over Aleister Crowley, which had a lot to do in steering me towards Orthodoxy. 

Anyway, he mentioned another Buddhist temple around the area and how they are Pure Land Buddhist which he’s not into because of the prayers and worship involved. My friend is an atheist and his interest in Buddhism does not go beyond meditation and the “being a good person” aspects and I can’t know if that’s every material objectivist viewpoint while it makes sense that that is as deep as it goes for them, spiritually. 

It makes sense that if one assumes religion, as corrupt and violent as it can be, is mostly a code of conduct in order to lead better lives, why would that be of interest to someone who feels they don’t need a book to tell them how to be a good person? 

Especially considering giving people a code of conduct is masking an authoritarian vibe, which the secular world is more than a little uncomfortable with, as am I.

Pure Land Buddhism is a branch off the Mahayana bodhi tree and, the way my friend explained it, is a form of Buddhism concerned with the afterlife. It is a devotional practice in conjunction with all the stereotypical images of Buddhism—meditation, nonviolence, etc. Tradition says that where Pure Land enters the Buddhist framework is through a ruler who, upon learning Dharmic teachings, renounced his throne and became a monk.

The monk’s name was Dharmākara, and he promised that once he had attained Buddhahood, he would create a celestial realm where those who had faith in him would be reborn and have an easier time of achieving enlightenment there. This nonlocal space awaiting the faithful is called Sukhāvatī, otherwise known as the Pure Land. This monk, having attained his Buddhahood thus being able to create this paradise is known as Buddha Amitabha.

The Pure Land can be attained by the Buddhists who sincerely invoke Buddha Amitabha’s name, meditating on it in a practice called Nembutsu where the practitioner chants, “Namo Amida Bu,” meaning I follow Amitabha Buddha, or I entrust myself to Amitabha Buddha. The practice, like many spiritual practices, is not of an intellectual nature nor is it an employment of cognitive function, but rather a prayer of the heart that works to open one up to receive what they seek.

The Buddha Amitabha is a savior figure and what struck me is the similarity between this practice and the Jesus prayer, although, this being Buddhism it is not a form of worship. This practice is a form of veneration.

In any case my friend is not a Pure Land Buddhist, nor a Tibetan Buddhist, nor any kind of religious adherent. He is an atheist with an interest in meditation and does not see this as a worthwhile practice and—being orthodox—neither do I. Orthodox φρόνημα notwithstanding I appreciate what attaining enlightenment means, but I do not blame him because what the hell is enlightenment?

As the saying goes: before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water; after enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. I bet someone who’s not interested in the spiritual path would be seeing that you’re chopping wood either way, so what’s the point of doing the whole spiritual journey if it just leads back where you began?

The journey is the point, but I understand the objection. It takes going where you don’t belong to work out where you do, and even then, where you do belong might be benefitted from all you pick up along the way. Like figuring out you want to marry someone but needing to have worked out stuff about yourself before you’re ready—no matter how perfect the two of y’all fit.

Plus, the spiritual journey is fun, but I digress.

The Western mind does not generally have a good grasp on what enlightenment actually is, and fewer than that actually care to attain it.

Kind of like becoming a child of God, most have their own idea as to what that means, but I’m willing to bet few know the real meaning, and even if they did, they would not want to do what was necessary to become reborn in His image.

There are the apostles, Dharmākara, and then there’s us… all of us a rich, young ruler in our own right.

Regardless, I kind of think this branch of Buddhism is a brilliant piece of spiritual praxis. Attaining something one seeks by giving up seeking altogether and just doing the work. Enlightenment is not something one can buy, hold, or wear as a sash.

It’s something you do. Something you embody.

It is becoming like Christ.

I am ignorant in regard to Buddhism et al, but the 12th Century Buddhist priest Hōnen taught that most men were incapable of achieving Buddhahood in this incarnation through their own endeavor, but rather were dependent on the Buddha Amitabha’s help, which means foregoing enlightenment in this life and working it out in the next, in Sukhāvatī.

I believe that when one allows an eternity to accomplish their goals, they can begin moving toward it, relaxed, in this life.

A devotional practice is not everyone’s cup of tea; however, we find things to devote energy to whether we believe in God or not, and what we worship is what we become. Looking at the Pure Land Buddhist school of thought I see a breathing kōan the adherent lives through prayer and meditation where, because there’s no rush to attain enlightenment here, it becomes that much easier to attain enlightenment here.

We’re just here drinking another fella’s coffee.  

Thanks for reading Coyote Witness! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Not saying the average follower of this tradition is guaranteed moksha if they follow this line of logic because, as previously mentioned, this practice only benefits the sincere in faith, anything less is being a consumer. If one prays to Buddha Amitabha piously and vigorously enough, humble enough, they will gain the favor they seek per tradition.

And maybe it’s good enough to know enlightenment is on the other side of this life’s death. And maybe it’s enough to seek stillness in this incarnation while cultivating virtuous qualities. 

But I don’t necessarily believe any religious tradition, originally, had it in mind to simply make someone good

“No one is good but One, that is, God” (Matthew 19:17).

Therefore, the idea that religion and spiritual practice is supposed to make “good people” is a bit lost on me, because that is not really important—being good for good’s sake is nice, but it ain’t enlightenment. Religious and spiritual praxis is a humbling endeavor with a side effect of it makes being patient and kind fairly easy when dealing with others. 

The humility we cultivate on the path, hopefully, guides us where we are best suited to serve, allows us to become conduits of Divinity, and ultimately makes us holy.

Buddhism may differ here, but the applicative nature of Christianity is to become holy, to become like God. 

Good is a subjective term and though there are certain thou-shalts and thou-shalt-nots the purpose is to make one holy, not good. To me, becoming a “good person” has the implication of pride and with it, inaction. The Buddhist and Christian nonviolent mindset blends awfully well into the “white moderate” of Dr. King’s letter to Birmingham. Merely someone who follows the rules and looks down on those who do not. I have a little over one thousand days of sobriety and what I’ve gathered in almost three years without a Jager is that there is a difference between sobriety and recovery; being good and doing the work are different things. 

Sobriety is like being a dry drunk, which is helpful to recognize because this type of behavior is basically that of despondency, some fence-sitting fatalism that awaits a relapse while rolling our eyes at the antics of those we consider beneath us—those who still choose to drink or do drugs, or whatever it is they do. That’s because when one has a problem it is easier to point that problem out in others, especially when one is so “good” as not to drink, however their focus is still on it, convinced that everyone else has the same issues as them—projecting on others what they can’t handle by themselves as if everyone were the same.

St. Seraphim of Sarov said “Beware the sin of despondency, for it gives birth to every evil: agitation, blame, complaint against one’s fate. The soul then avoids people, believing them to be the cause, not realizing the cause is within itself.” 

Recovery is different in that one focuses their efforts on themselves, realizing the cause of their agitation and misfortune is within. It’s real work and it must be done, as a reflection of the Buddha Amitabha we do this work so we can help others do this work. We’re here to change, we’re here to become holy, “If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus: That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness” (Ephesians 4:21-24).

There are foundational differences between the Buddhist and Christian traditions, but they both seek self-transformation which is more that can be said for some other spiritual paths, but what my friend and others might see is simply organizations that are based on making people “good” and if that is the case no one can blame them for not latching on to these institutions. And even then, my friend did not like the idea of the Pure Land’s devotional practices or their focus on the afterlife, which will change the individual.

If they are uninterested in even the self-transformative properties, then there really is nothing one can do except to pray that God has mercy on all of us. Pray to God to have mercy on those who reject religion because they have been hurt by it, reject religion because they do not understand, reject the spiritual path that each of us must walk to become. 

Beyond that it makes no difference whether they see religion as a means of becoming good or attaining enlightenment because there are those who do not want either. All I can do is live outwardly Christian and tend my garden, because that is all I have: “Success is thy proof: argue not; convert not; talk not overmuch!” (Liber AL III:42). If I busy myself with trying to make someone see my viewpoint, I’ll lose myself to ego; I’m right back to being a dry drunk, pointing out the faults in others for not following my lead, yelling at my cool brother to put his house in order while mine falls apart behind me. 

The basis of true Christian thought is change.

We are born so that we might become reborn in His image, through baptism and the regenerative power of the sacraments. We are born to die to ourselves and this world, a thousand days at a time. 

We are born to forget our lives here and remember the eternal glory of the life to come. We are here to struggle against the things of this world.

We are here to change

Orthodox Christians are called to recover a sense of Truth, which is that the kingdom lies within us. 

We are born to change. And repentance is a part of that—every day, turning toward God, every moment—turning toward God. It’s always a choice. It’s our choice to make. A thousand seconds, minutes, and days at a time.

The oft-forgotten key here is that it is our choice, it’s not for someone else to choose for us nor can we choose for anyone else. I have this life to live; if I get distracted by the way others live their lives, I’ll be forfeiting my own hot streak, letting it freeze over, and explode just like a couple bottles of hops-flavored sparkling water left out in the snow.

Si comprehendis, non est Deus


Leave a comment